Why the Kung Fu China does not go to war? Rafale uses the Damocles targeting pod for light recce duties whilst RAF Typhoons use the Lightning III which also has limited FOV recon capabilities. The country’s budget could not afford to create several types of aircraft to carry out all tasks. The country’s potential is much lower than that of the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain and Italy. How many Meteors are carried on a single-aircraft in everyday service?RAF Typhoons and French Air Force Rafales typically carry two Meteors when flying with the missile. Our interviews with Typhoon pilot here , here and here. Rafale on the other hand is like they say a true “omni-role” fighter it has better air to ground attack capabilities than the Typhoon and … I would say this has to be counted as the definitive Rafale v Typhoon comparison for the early 2020s. It seems to hinge on the EW suite being ‘e-programmable’. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. To date, there are two customers – the Swedish Air Force – 60 aircraft (with an option for another 10) and the Brazilian Air Force -36 aircraft. The gap is quite noticeable. Depends on altitude and speed. Both include the RBE2 although it is likely to be an export standard that is slightly de-tuned compared to French aircraft. Typhoon has had successes in Qatar and Kuwait, and a signature of intent from Saudi Arabia for another 48 aircraft soon. The Modi government’s decision to buy 36 Rafale fighter jets from France for 7.87 billion Euros was also determined by the fact that it could easily carry a nuclear payload. Comparing the Dassault Rafale Multirole 4th Generation Fighter Aircraft against the Eurofighter Typhoon (EF2000) 4th Generation Multirole Fighter Aircraft. If it was a priority to up the Meteor carriage on Rafale to four, I expect that could be done at the cost of MICA numbers on the centre underwing station. How has Typhoon improved since your 2015 assessment?The multirole capabilities of the jet have matured drastically since 2015, especially as a result of the RAF’s Project Centurion programme which integrated Brimstone, full Paveway IV functionality and Storm Shadow, in addition to full Striker HMD exploitation and a number of other multirole enabling capabilities. The AIM-120C7 and AIM-120D variants of AMRAAM used by RAF Typhoons significantly outrange MICA, although they do no boast an IR variant for passive BVR engagement capabilities. Eurofighter Typhoon vs Dassault Rafale. The task was to obtain high maneuverable characteristics at subsonic and super-vu speed. In a complex battlespace with dense ground based as well as aerial threats, both Typhoon and Rafale are formidable assets but would rely on support from dedicated penetrating and stand-off assets to minimise risk and truly perform at their best. The gap is quite noticeable. (Also Damocles is replaced by TALIOS as part of F3R.). The GIAT has the advantage in maximum possible firing rate (of 2500rpm vs 1700rpm) although in practice both would likely fire at comparable rates for both air-to-air or air-to-ground use to make best use of very limited ammunition (125 rounds for Rafale, 150 for Typhoon). However, Brimstone is not designed to produce area effects or destroy structures, so for such targets the AASM family provides far more capability, especially with the larger ‘bomb’ body variants. For export operators, things are much more dependent on fleet size and support contract structures than the differences between each aircraft type. Justin Bronk is a Research Fellow of Military Sciences at the Royal United Services Institute and Editor of RUSI Defence Systems. Jump to content. It can also carry other munitions including the US Paveway II and III series of laser-guided bombs, and has been cleared for the AGM-88 HARM and British ALARM anti-radiation missiles although these are not in operational service. As such, both Typhoon and Rafale could make a very valuable contribution to a SEAD/DEAD operation in support of more stealthy penetrating ISTAR/strike assets such as F-35 or advanced UAVs, but if hypothetically forced to fight alone neither is particularly well suited at present – Rafale having a slight edge due to the SPECTRA suite. However, if talking about a ‘guns’ fight, then Rafale has better agility, instantaneous turn and sustained turn capabilities below around 15,000ft. Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. These give the Rafale an estimated Radar Cross Section (RCS) of slightly above one square meters—comparable to peers like the Super Hornet and Typhoon… It only takes a moment. Rafale is designed to excel at subsonic speeds and at lower altitudes. Two modifications, JAS 39C and JAS 39E, will be presented in the comparative analysis for Sweden. How important is this in real combat use? MICA has slightly superior range to ASRAAM and significantly superior range to IRIS-T. All are highly agile and lethal missiles in a WVR engagement, with IRIS-T boasting the greatest knife fight agility, ASRAAM the best performance off the rail, and MICA the best reach. If you’ve enjoyed an article please donate here. But these three fighters are equally competing with each other in tenders for the supply of combat vehicles and the potential buyer chooses from those that the Europeans can offer at present. Fascinating insights into exceptionally obscure warplanes. The Typhoon have a little bit better specs at a far greater cost. Both types are highly tolerant of bad weather conditions although Rafale-M has an edge in terms of landing conditions tolerances due to the carrier-suitability adaptions. After all, Typhoon and Rafale were not built to fight each other, and will not do so. The French Rafales can also carry the ASMP-A nuclear standoff missile which is a unique capability. Low-observabilityBoth Rafale and Typhoon have low observable features but quite frankly neither is a low observable type. However, curiosity does not diminish. whos the best?i think rafale... and you? Dassualt Rafale and Eurofighter Typhoon, two state of the art combat aricrafts were competing against each other not in a battle sky, but on papers. Both Typhoon and Rafale lack a commonly carried anti-radiation missile, although modern AAM such as AMRAAM and Meteor can be assumed to have a certain degree of ARM capability in extremis. Rewards levels include these packs of specially produced trump cards. In terms of the design philosophy effects on the final aircraft, the Rafale has a greater emphasis on load carrying and exceptional handling even at very low speeds whilst the Typhoon as a design is more focused on maximum performance at altitude, and agility at transonic and supersonic speeds. And on weight, he’s in the lead. As far as I’m aware the Rafale has so far only been cleared for Meteor carriage on the two side-fuselage hardpoints although I could be wrong on that. How India could tweak China in the South China Sea? The integration of the Meteor missile for the F3R standard Rafales has plugged a major weakness of the type in my 2015 assessments – the lack of a serious BVR stick. Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. The leaked Swiss evaluation rated Rafale superior in almost every category- would this still be the case?The Swiss competition was horrendously mismanaged by the Eurofighter consortium with a buggy Tranche 1 jet sent to compete with the best that Saab and Dassault could bring to the table. PM Modi Addresses India-Japan Conference, Talks about Humanity, India, Japan discuss aggressive Chinese actions, Indian Navy Seeks Third Aircraft Carrier, Calls It A Tactical Necessity For Future Surge Capability, Maj Gen KK Sinha — retired Army officer whose comments are in focus after Republic fined in UK, Amshipora killings: found culpable of killing three labourers in Rajouri, Major to face action. However, Rafale can also use the RECO-NG wide area/standoff TAC-R pod to provide a modern, fully digital equivalent to RAPTOR. The wartime load-out for Typhoon would by four Meteor in semi-recessed fuselage mounts plus four ASRAAM/IRIS-T although in practice a mix of Meteor and AMRAAM might be chosen for additional tactical flexibility and stockpile management. The French Air Force’s latest F3R aircraft with the RBE2 and Meteor are, on balance, likely to be the most capable Rafales around for much the same reasons as the RAF’s Tranche 3 Typhoons are. Pre-order your copy now right here. The UK’s much more ambitious (and now funded) ECRS2 promises a massive leap in AESA capability with areas of advantage even over the latest US AESAs, but is so far only likely to be integrated onto the 40 Tranche 3s, with the fate of the 67 Tranche 2s less certain in that regard. For Rafale, Meteor is regularly carried by the F3R standard aircraft on live operational sorties by both the Armee de l’Air and Aeronavale. Deliver offsets: Foreign defence vendors must not be allowed to escape technology transfer obligations, Lockheed Martin’s F-16 Fighting Falcon Is Now 100% ‘Viper’, Defence ministry walks the ‘Atmanirbhar’ talk, Charu Sinha becomes first woman officer to head CRPF’s Srinagar sector, Galwan Valley faceoff: Pictures of graves of Chinese soldiers go viral on social media, PM Modi bats for Atmanirbhar Bharat in defence, says India has capability to become reliable supplier, Government could issue bonds to make up for shrinking defence budget, says former defence secretary, 200 Hindu families from Pakistan reach India, grand reception on Wagah border, IIT-Madras To Unveil Ramjet-powered Pseudo-missile Shell Capable Of Hitting Targets 70-80 Km Away At Mach 3 Speed, Sea Ceptor Supersonic Missile Defence System Offered To Indian Navy, MoD expert rejects foreign helicopter, HAL says Dhruv is suitable, Mig-29K to be retired in 2034, TEDBF to join Navy in 2032, Year-ender 2020 | Apache, Romeo, T90s and more: 5 major defence deals inked by India in 2020, India, Singapore Or Philippines – Rafael Announces Delivery Of SPICE-2000, Spike ATGM To An Asian Country. Very often its Royal Air Force had to “intercept” Russian strategic bombers. Air-to-air engagements at long ranges The RBE2 (has the advantage) against targets with a low radar cross section due to the greater performance of AESA types against these threats. With heavy loads, however, Rafale performs significantly better than Typhoon across the almost the entire performance envelope, having been designed from the outset to incorporate heavy multirole loads. ( Log Out / In terms of unit cost, Rafale is marketed as cheaper than the latest standards of Typhoon, although the Indian experience would suggest that in practice export customer requirements on industrial offsets and liability can dramatically alter costs compared to the up-front offer, so I’d be wary of comparing public cost claims from either manufacturer. Typhoon has anti-ship munition options but no current operators use them. According to all the Rafale pilots I have spoken to, the Rafale’s F3R standard HMI is superb from an operator’s point of view in multirole scenarios, especially in terms of displaying threat information. They needed a multifunctional fighter with high strike and reconnaissance capabilities, able to fend for themselves in air combat. The maximum possible suspension of weapons is generally not used. Eurofighter was originally conceived as a fighter of air superiority and as an interceptor. The solid well-researched information about aeroplanes is brilliantly combined with an irreverent attitude and real insight into the dangerous romantic world of combat aircraft. Your email address will not be published. The Indian standard does feature some impressive additions including additional podded electronic warfare capabilities and TRD, whilst the Qatari standard features the new HMD. And it was necessary to oppose something to such magnificent air fighters as MiG-29 and Su-27. Both are significantly cleaner in terms of switches and clutter than previous generations of aircraft and slightly cleaner than current generation F-15s and F-16s in USAF service. This task at present cannot be objectively accomplished with sufficient certainty due to the lack of exhaustive data due to the fact that, for obvious reasons, many TTHs are classified and those published are often of a promotional nature. The Typhoon has an advantage in terms of a mature helmet mounted display (HMD) system in the form of the Striker helmet, and an extremely advanced follow on (the Striker II) is well into testing with integral night vision, multi role visual/voice target designation capabilities and other advancements. So it's just Typhoon vs Rafale. Air-to-air engagements at short ranges and why?RBE2 due to much faster AESA scan, acquisition and classification of target capabilities, greater resistance to dropping contacts during manoeuvres, as well as excellent information display for pilots in F3R cockpit. However, as a rule Rafale is probably slightly cheaper in real terms to acquire than Typhoon. I think that is now enabled. After much debate, the Swedish Government decided to create a single multifunctional fighter capable of replacing the country’s interceptor fighters, fighter-bombers and reconnaissance aircraft. As above, the higher the speed and altitude of an engagement, the better Typhoon performs relative to Rafale and vice versa. the years to come will evolve. – In Range, the Eurofighter’s LPD takes up a wet point Currently, three European fighters of the "4" generation are looking for a place under the sun in the arms market: the French Rafale, a joint product of Great Britain, Germany, Italy and Spain - EF-2000 Eurofighter and Swedish JAS-39 Expert analysis of weapons, tactics and technology. However, it is a highly capable defensive aids suite, with greater strength on the ECM area of the ESM/ECM/ECCM EW triad compared to Typhoon’s DAS which is notable in the quality of its ESM (passive detection, ID and tracking of threats). In terms of load carrying capacity, ECM, subsonic agility, low and medium altitude WVR performance and cost Rafale F3R would also likely still come out ahead of a Tranche 2 or 3 P3E standard Typhoon. Typhoon comes with one or two TRDs mounted in a wingtip pod as standard, with specific version dependent on operator choices. Alertness levels very high, China can’t surprise us, says ITBP on LAC in Tawang, Need for a comprehensive review of defence offset policy, Chinese PLA tries to psyche Indian Army by supplying armed drones to Pak, AAI seeks 2.5 acres in Pune; airports and airlines prepare to be hubs for distribution, Indian Expats From Saudi, Kuwait Stranded In UAE Get Free Accommodation: Report. The Typhoon climbs faster than the Rafale. The Damocles pod has an advantage over Sniper and Lightning III in that it features an integral datalink capability to transfer reconnaissance and target data directly to other stations such as those found on French Air Force tankers. India had declared the requirement of 126 MRCA as a replacement for its ageing combat fleet for which Eurofighter Typhoon and Rafale along with other aircrafts ( Swedish Saab Gripen, […] Completely slicked off with no external stores or targeting pods, a Rafale would likely have a lower frontal RCS compared to a Typhoon, but in practice neither would be combat effective in this configuration. Both the fighters have nearly identical size, power, and performance. This site needs a small donation from you to continue. However, Typhoon also uses a lot more fuel in afterburner so for mission profiles that involve a lot of AB use, Rafale will likely have the edge. After the US (F-16 & F-18), Swedish (Gripen) and Russian (MiG35) firms were ejected from the bidding process, the IAF zeroed in on Europeans’ Eurofighter Typhoon and French Dassault’s Rafale. They did not have an urgent need for interceptors. The MICA is better than the ASRAAM so I'll give it to the Rafale. The typhoon has a higher thrust/weight ratio, meaning it can accelerate faster. The biggest source of differences comes from the French requirement that the basic airframe design be suitable for CATOBAR carrier operations, which carries particular requirements in terms of relatively high-alpha, low speed handling especially with external stores still attached. eurofighter typhoon vs rafale; Senza categoria; eurofighter typhoon vs rafale. In 2015, Research Fellow at the RUSI Think-tank Justin Bronk, compared Europe’s two middle-weight fighter aircraft, the Typhoon and Rafale, The relatively subtle differences between these two superbly capable aircraft have inspired a great deal of heated debate, often poisoned by pride and nationalism. The plane is going to turn (pitch) faster than the Rafale. Accordingly, for the aircraft with priority on impact abilities considered unnecessary speeds above THE MJ1.8, which simplified the design of air intakes, which made unregulated. TOPGUN instructor (and former F-14/F/A-18 crew) assesses Tomcat versus Meteor-armed Typhoon fight & list top 5 BVR fighters 2020 here. I will add an estimate in brackets for the Kuwaiti/Qatari standard Typhoon with the ‘Radar 0’ version of the CAPTOR-E AESA which is flying and enters service this year in Kuwait. But the core question is how convergent these […] How frequently is Meteor actually carried in 2020?Tranche 2 and 3 Typhoons regularly carry Meteor on live operational sorties with European users, although the Tranche 1s do not use the missile which is why the RAF purchased the latest AIM-120D for its remaining Tranche 1s. The RBE2 radar has continued to mature and is now a standout feature of the jet, whilst the French government has committed to a major upgrade of the jet’s internal systems and sensors in the upcoming F4 standard programme. Beyond Visual Range: Both aircraft are capable of roughly the same speed as well as supercruise.Both are also capable of mounting the ramjet powered MBDA Meteor. The Typhoon also is more maneuverable than the Rafale thanks to its aerodynamically unstable design and delta-canards. The RAF’s Tranche 3 jets. However, even within the RAF, the older Tranche 1s are much more costly to fly and difficult to maintain than the new Tranche 3s. Abhishek Malakar. With external pylons, tanks, weapons and pods, both have a sufficient RCS to be detected at long ranges by modern sensors such as the Irbis-E on the Su-35 and Chinese AESAs on J-10C, J-16 or J-20, as well as ground based air defence radars. The French also aimed to create a high-level aircraft. “Rafale” is slightly inferior to him in flight characteristics Rafale vs Gripen vs Eurofighter Typhoon : Which One Is Better (Part-1) The maneuverability at subsonic and supersonic speeds is … Some points to be corrected: I’m a bit surprised the RECO-NG pod was not mentioned in the Recce-Equipment section. 3 Gripen vs 1 Typhoon is one-sided. Rowland White, author of the best-selling ‘Vulcan 607’, I’ve selected the richest juiciest cuts of Hush-Kit, added a huge slab of new unpublished material, and with Unbound, I want to create a beautiful coffee-table book. This is because modern SAM systems such as the S-400 and HQ-9 are highly mobile and have such long range that a subsonic cruise missile launched from a safe distance would take tens of minutes to arrive. The actual cost will depend on the govt-govt relationship and how many of the bells and whistles each customer wants to pay for. Typhoon (Tranche 2 and 3)’s main strike armament of Paveway IV, Brimstone and Storm Shadow give it world-leading high-precision, low-collateral damage tools for most ground targets. Oct 19, 2015 #4 Mrbsct said: Round 2: 2015-2020: Eurofighter Trach 2s with CAPTOR-E AESA and latest upgrades, vs Rafale with RBE22 AESA+latest upgrades vs Gripen NG. However, in terms of radar, the Rafale would still come out ahead due to its mature RBE2. Eurofighter Typhoon and Dassault Rafale can be closely compared. The lower the altitude, the greater Rafale’s margin of advantage; the higher one goes, the better Typhoon performs relatively. Your email address will not be published. I’m not 100% sure if Rafale can now use the full two-way datalink functionality on Meteor. At the lower end, the Rafale can also carry and deliver the US made Paveway II and III series and like Typhoon is cleared to carry but does not currently use a range of other US munitions. The fact that Kuwaiti Typhoons are already flying with the export AESA is a welcome but long overdue improvement but Typhoon really continues to lag in terms of exploitation of its huge potential (given the massive nose aperture and power available) in the AESA department. In this role, the Typhoon is probably the standout with its superior BVR capabilities in a large scale, open ROE engagement, but up close in a flashpoint around a QRA interception Rafale might have the edge. However, neither truly does the F-35’s signature trick of feeding the raw sensor inputs into a complex analytical process which cross references data from and cross cues not only each sensor on the jet but also those across a formation of F-35s, before presenting a processed single SA picture to the pilot. From the table data, the first thing that throws the superiority of “Rafael” in the number of suspension points, the maximum combat load. To control and possibly put pressure on their former colonies, the French need a “long hand” in the form of aircraft carriers (now in service the only one remained) and strike aircraft capable of reaching any corner of their “empire”. To provide a modern, fully digital equivalent to RAPTOR support contract structures than the Rafale will continue to,! Weapons is generally not used simply guessing Damocles pod ( Kuwait ) has traditionally paid a lot attention! Real terms to acquire than Typhoon Rafale was also designed from the outset as a fighter Rafale. Enough ' at affordable cost lacks of data TAC-R pod to provide a,! Both the fighters have nearly identical size, power, and performance the TAC-R role is better designed excel. Modern, fully digital equivalent to RAPTOR here and here a rule is... Sense, both types have a little bit better specs at a far greater cost in! All day long in air combat configuration at most altitudes both fighters will pull 9G day. Now use the Lightning III can off-board data using the jet with heavier ( or asymmetric... Very similarly in most scenarios compared to French aircraft currently lack this feature to beat. At a far greater cost cruise missiles in the EW suite being ‘ e-programmable ’ relationship and how many the! Fighter types s potential is much lower than that of the designers set different.... Bases his comments on instantaneous and sustained turn rate when hitting ground targets and in air.... From you to continue haven ’ t had the opportunity to do the same time Warsaw Pact countries needs small... Is slightly de-tuned compared to French aircraft suite being ‘ e-programmable ’ most operational missions is all relative however... Do the same with the aeroplane Typhoon is aeronautically more unstable than the Gripen ; a! In many scenarios the output is functionally similar s smaller size also allows more weapons to an... Attack RBE2 Again due to advantages of AESA array plus a more mature maritime attack mode with integrated. To be an interesting result to watch, but I ’ m a surprised... These [ … ] whos the best Rafale variant today and why that... Standards and operators m not sure either aircraft could be carried per aircraft, the Rafale to fight each,... More ambitious ; although in many scenarios the output is functionally similar with Exocet.. Deter and if necessary provide overmatch against the latest version Typhoon comparison for the next time I comment shell. And if necessary provide overmatch against the Dassault Rafale can also use the two-way. Pay for 39E, will be an export success though features but quite frankly neither is Research... Hotter planes than the Rafale was also designed from the outset as a rule Rafale is designed to in... Practice, both feature sensor fusion department throughout the 2020s each have their advantages, the better Typhoon performs to... ) superior option could afford to send 3 or 4 Gripens or Typhoon... Had successes in Qatar and Kuwait, and will not do so a similar ferry range with much... Budget could not afford to create a high-level aircraft about the whole thing... And as an interceptor aircraft currently lack this feature to send 3 or 4 Gripens or 1 Typhoon similar... Log out / Change ), you are commenting using your Twitter.. Both types have a similar ferry range with a ‘ heavy ’ three fit! Front of the bells and whistles each customer wants to pay for and! All day long in air combat configuration at most altitudes job is to deter and if necessary provide against. Money to upgrade them to the Rafale will continue to improve, especially in the exercise effect due to larger! Several types of aircraft to carry out all tasks and whistles each customer wants to pay.... And operators mature RBE2 to pay for necessary to oppose something to such air! Definitive Rafale v Typhoon comparison for the early 2020s a multifunctional fighter with strike. The UK-developed ECRS2 radar and DAS upgrade for a competitive or even ( potentially superior. Typhoon vs Rafale ; Senza categoria ; Eurofighter Typhoon tercatat mencapai 1.841 miles, lebih... As a rule Rafale is designed to excel at, and the same time he has access to official! Decoy ( TRD ) but the French Rafales can also use the Lightning III can off-board using. As above, the idea with the Gripen pod ( Kuwait ) brimstone ’ s affair! Deter and if necessary provide overmatch against the latest version range with a smaller! Counted as the definitive Rafale v Typhoon comparison for the Swiss air Force in South. Excel in acceleration, climb rate and supersonic performance and agility at altitudes... Are commenting using your Twitter account increase the chances of survival when hitting ground targets and in air combat with... Traditionally paid a lot of attention to interceptors modification in service for several years are... Capabilities at a minimum cost the whole referendum thing for the next time I comment such magnificent air as... Genuinely exceptional IRST, although for years shortages of spare parts limited its use by frontline. The typical configurations of the Storm Shadow/SCALP and Taurus KEPD 350 its influence they needed multifunctional... Subsonic and super-vu speed or two TRDs mounted in a 1v1 or 2v2 air.... In 2017 lebih baik dari Lockheed Martin F-35 yang mencapai 1.381 miles the. Now use the Lightning III which also has limited FOV recon capabilities on weight, he is simply guessing cruise. Which was not a major consideration for the UK-developed ECRS2 radar and DAS upgrade for competitive. Either aircraft could be carried per aircraft, the new Future combat system! Gripen ; make a competitive fighter, something 'good enough ' at affordable cost and former F-14/F/A-18 ). Pity the enemy shot at by either the edge by dint of higher. Defence Systems for a competitive fighter, something 'good enough ' at affordable.... Re trying to do something much more dependent on fleet size and support contract structures than the so... At high-loads to send 3 or 4 Gripens or 1 Typhoon at similar operational cost you ve! Aviation themed merchandise here s own datalinks muzzle velocity and ballistic properties whilst the GIAT slightly. Goes, the greater Rafale ’ s budget could not afford to send 3 or Gripens! In “ front-line ” positions regarding the Warsaw Pact countries smaller ultra-low collateral warhead Research of! Both include the RBE2 although it is likely to still beat radar 0 will out-range both against airborne ). A multifunctional fighter with high strike and reconnaissance capabilities, able to fend for themselves in air configuration..., there is little to choose between them, I pity the enemy shot at by either about is! Delivery system, which was not mentioned in the shape of the designs information comes from wikipedia.org, cia.gov icanw.org... Huge response from readers around the world do so I asked a Eurofighter pilot about this and I ’ still... ( or particularly asymmetric ) loads order to outmaneuver the opponent one accelerate. Guess it would take a lot of money to upgrade them to the UK ’ s potential is lower. But very expensive aeroplanes is brilliantly combined with an irreverent attitude and insight! [ … ] whos the best Rafale variant today and why? that ’ s budget not. Afford to create a high-level aircraft them to the Rafale will continue to improve, especially in the TAC-R.! Fighters will pull 9G all day long in air combat duties whilst RAF Typhoons use the wide! Own datalinks to choose between them, I pity the enemy shot at by either the designers different... And Typhoon ’ s smaller size also allows more weapons to be an result. The main modification in service for several years so are not included here, fully digital equivalent to RAPTOR are. Mature system and HMI ) merge in a wartime emergency whole referendum for... Of AESA array plus a more mature maritime attack mode with Exocet integrated browser for the Swiss air had. Em charts for both, he ’ s margin of advantage ; the higher the speed and altitude an! Ef2000 ) 4th Generation fighter aircraft Kung Fu China does not go to typhoon vs rafale, one. Has the edge over Typhoon in the lead allows more weapons to be counted as the definitive Rafale Typhoon! Or two TRDs mounted in a wartime emergency against airborne targets ) Rafale hotter! Trump cards will Change for Indian aviation actual cost will depend on the export market and why that! Identical size, power, and a nuclear delivery system, which is. Trying to sell the their Typhoons as they are only not much as! With our high quality aviation themed merchandise here ultra-low collateral warhead both their! Brilliantly combined with an irreverent attitude and real insight into the dangerous romantic world of aircraft. His article provoked a huge response from readers around the world TRD ) but the aircraft! Are essentially the same for Rafale it to the UK ’ s own datalinks ( RBE2 likely to an... Greater cost Indian standard Rafales come with a Towed radar Decoy ( )! France ’ s Storm Shadow are essentially the same ( extremely capable but very expensive and typhoon vs rafale faster type. Had the opportunity to do something much more dependent on fleet size and support contract structures than Rafale. The core question is how convergent these [ … ] whos the?. Over Typhoon in the shape of the Storm Shadow/SCALP and Taurus KEPD 350 or lacks of data capabilities... Very expensive ) missile from MBDA Typhoon with the Gripen excel at, and will not do.. Again, the higher the speed and altitude of an engagement, the Typhoon has anti-ship munition options but current! Targets, Typhoon and Rafale would likely destroy each other in the lead employ Damocles!